Household Violence, Even the mention of the words conjures up the larger than living image of some battered, bruised woman on a freeway billboard; a day glow orange hot-line number beneath the girl visage, and some catchy slogan like "love shouldn't damage. "

And no, I am not insensitive to battered females. My heart goes out to any real victim. But the time I see the images of bruised men on those advertisements, I'll be less prone to being offended at seeing the photographs of beaten women being propped up like the depriving children you see on your TV at two in the morning; those you can feed, clothe and send to Harvard with regard to 12 dollars a month.

The myth is simple and designed for the easy minded. Domestic violence is almost exclusively perpetrated by adult men against women. Even better, it means brutish thugs pounding the particular crap out of Mary Poppins for burning the toasted bread. And here and there, that is true. But if you think the item defines the problem, or even comes close, you need to take Dr . Phil out of your TIVO to-do list and start picking up some real publications.

This non-sense didn't spring out of thin air. It was and it is the raison d'étre of feminists, in their claim regarding patriarchal domination and how that extended into the home and even family. All their beliefs hinge on the notion that men domination is male dominated. And on the surface it makes sense, specifically if you don't think about it. And of course we didn't, so the idea distribute like chlamydia in a cat house.

But let us study it now. You deserve a lot more depth than exists in a sound bite.

I'll start with some research that many would feel was from a reputable source. The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, GEORGIA. This is the summary of their findings as published in the United states Journal of Public Health, May 2007. First, almost 24% of all relationships had some level of violence. Half of all those relationships involved just one of the partners being violent. The other one half were reciprocally violent. Now, in relationships where violence of any kind was perpetrated by just one person, over 70% of that had been committed by the woman.

Did you get that? In all human relationships in that particular study, more than 7 out of 10 batterers were female.

Let's look even closer at the information as it relates to relationships where both partners are chaotic. This half is even more interesting than the first fifty percent.

The study concluded that reciprocally violent relationships were most likely in order to result in injuries, particularly to women. They were also a strong predictor of future, repeated violence for women, but not adult males. In other words, women who engaged in mutual combat with men had been much more likely to have a pattern of instigating repeated assaults. In a number of violence was much more likely to be isolated, and, contrary to the repetitive assertions of feminists, not likely to be repeated. Now allow me to sum up those conclusions in a clearer form of English. Human relationships where both are violent are more likely to result in the woman getting harmed. Those relationships are also marked by women who are much much more likely than men to initiate and maintain that violence to begin with.

We have common expression for much of the men's violence during these situations.

It's called hitting back.

I know, there is no reason for violence. Ever, some would say. But there is certainly legal, and in the belief of many, moral justification for self-defense. Either way, it is a judgment call made after, and only right after, an attack has been made. In fairness, it has to be pointed out that this study, for many reasons, including methodology, can't fairly become generalized to the entire population. And one study alone is simple enough to dispute, even from a sound source. Therefore let's look at a hundred more.

Professor John Archer is really a psychologist at The University of Central Lancashire and the famous head of the Aggression Research Group at the same university. In the analysis of 100 British and American studies this individual concludes that women are more likely than men to initiate violence in their relationships and are more likely to be aggressive more frequently. This individual also addresses the myth that women are only violent as a couple of self defense by reporting that 29% of female university students admitted to physically attacking their boyfriends when absolutely no threat was perceived.

I know feminists won't be convinced with this, nor will they by several hundred more studies, however let's look at them anyway. Professor Martin S. Fiebert of the California State University Psychology Department conducted a great analysis of 249 scholarly investigations, 194 empirical scientific studies and 55 reviews regarding domestic violence. The aggregate small sample size in the reviewed studies numbers over 241, seven hundred people.

Fiebert's conclusion? Women are as physically hostile or more physically aggressive in relationships than men. And when you think that the incidence of female on male physical violence is mitigated by women suffering more injuries as a result of men, think again. There are widely conflicting studies on this. A number of them place women at greater risk, but many of them location men. If we examine Fiebert's annotated bibliography which covers a exhaustive amount of studies, there are many times more studies reported that show women more likely to inflict serious harm, such as with the use of weapons, than are men.

Are there other reports that contradict this? Absolutely. But there is a significant sufficient body of evidence to make three things patently clear.

one Domestic violence is not a product of gender. Attributing them to one gender over the other is not only misleading, it really hinders efforts to address the problem.

2 . Society is extremely misinformed about the nature, origins and realities of home-based violence.

3. Most of our legal and political dealing with of domestic violence is based on the myths and not typically the realities, leaving us to put all of our resources into half the problem.

As in so many other ways, we demonstrate a social tendency to remake reality, even embrace lies, once the truth about the fairer sex doesn't make them look everything fair.

Now many people of sound mind might well point out, "Fine, let's just focus our attention on coping with abusers and the abused, regardless of the sex. " But to claim things are not that simple is a monumental understatement.

Richard Gelles is currently a dean at the University of Pennsylvania together with holds The Joanne and Raymond Welsh Chair of kid Welfare and Family Violence in the School of Interpersonal Policy & Practice. He is an internationally known professional in domestic violence, and was influential in the passing of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 97.

Gelles wrote, regarding his work with Suzanne Steinmetz and Murray Strauss, "The response to our finding that the rate involving female-to-male violence was equal to the rate of male-to-female assault not only produced heated scholarly criticism, but intense as well as long lasting personal attacks. All three of us received death risks. Bomb threats were phoned in to conference centers and also buildings where we were scheduled to present. " Now is it all me, or is making terroristic threats of bombing and murder a rather strange way to protest being known as violent?

Returning to the evidence, though, it would be easy to make an discussion that domestic violence is more a female than a male issue. There are, after all, numerous studies that support that bottom line. But that would be as pointless as the current paradigm, and may result in my car blowing up the next time I start it again.

So for those of you screaming for me to quit picking on females and take gender out of the equation, that is precisely what I am performing. And what I am asking you to do, once and for all. If you really think that all violence is bad and shouldn't be tolerated, after that here is what you can do to prove it.

Write to Vp Biden and tell him to seek an end to the Violence Towards Women Act (VAWA), the legislation he authored which allocates billions to women victims but leaves gentlemen totally out of the picture. Men are, after all, injured by home violence, too. 835, 000 per year in America alone.

Begin holding shelters and social services to account once they have no real programs designed for men. Their failure to get this done is institutionalized sexism and needs to go.

Confront police along with prosecutors for their actions. Men who call for police assist when attacked by their partners are more likely than not like a one arrested, regardless of the circumstances.

Victims should be helped, not really arrested, incarcerated and stigmatized.

Be sure to express your arguments to and boycott the media outlets and companies like Pepsi and Fedex that use men getting over used as a sight gag in their advertising.
visit: https://batteredwoman.com