I read once that if you took all the real estate lawyers in Illinois and laid them end to end along the equator - it would be a good idea to leave them there. That's what I read. What do you suppose that means?

I have written before about the need to exercise due diligence when purchasing commercial real estate. The need to investigate, before Closing, every significant aspect of the property you are acquiring. The importance of evaluating each commercial real estate transaction with a mindset that once the Closing occurs, there is no going back. The Seller has your money and is gone. If post-Closing problems arise, Seller's contract representations and warranties will, at best, mean expensive litigation. CAVEAT EMPTOR! "Let the buyer beware!"

Paying extra attention at the beginning of a commercial real estate transaction to "get it right" can save tens of thousands of dollars when the deal goes bad. It's like the old Fram® oil filter slogan during the 1970's: "You can pay me now - or pay me later". In commercial real estate, however, "later" may be too late.

Buying commercial real estate is NOT like buying a home. It is not. It is not. It is NOT.

In Illinois, and many other states, virtually every residential real estate closing requires a lawyer for the buyer and a lawyer for the seller. This is probably smart. It is good consumer protection.

The "problem" this causes, however, is that every lawyer handling residential real estate transactions considers himself or herself a "real estate lawyer", capable of handling any real estate transaction that may arise.

We learned in law school that there are only two kinds of property: real estate and personal property. Therefore - we intuit - if we are competent to handle a residential real estate closing, we must be competent to handle a commercial real estate closing. They are each "real estate", right